Shell logo |
A
London-based law firm, Leigh Day, representing about 15,000 fishermen who
dragged Royal Dutch Shell to a British court, has stated that the fishermen
from Bodo community in Gokana Local Government of Rivers State have rejected an
offer of $51 million from Shell for “some of the largest oil spills in
history.”
The
President of the Technological and Construction Court, Justice Akenhead, ruled
on Friday that Shell can be legally liable for oil thefts if it fails to
protect its pipeline infrastructure.
Shell
countered the judgment was favorable in limiting litigation to "an
assessment of actual damages sustained" in spills, and said the judge
ruled the company's arguments "correct in all the crucial points."
Shell's
offer from September 2013 to settle the case for 30 million pounds or about
$51million remained on the table.
But Leigh Day lawyers for 15,000 fishermen who lost their
livelihoods in oil spills in 2008 and 2009 called Shell's offer laughable.
The court delivered judgment on preliminary issues raised in the legal action brought against Shell.
The court delivered judgment on preliminary issues raised in the legal action brought against Shell.
The
‘preliminary issues hearing’, which took place last April, was the first time
Shell had to face a formal court proceedings in the UK for its environmental
record in the Niger Delta, following two massive oil spills in 2008 and 2009.
Shell
offered $51million in compensation for two oil spills after a London court on
Friday rejected a larger claim.
Shell’s
Corporate Media Relations Manager, Mr. Precious Okolobo said in a statement
that Justice Akenhead, in his ruling, accepted that the interpretation of
Nigerian law by Shell was correct in all the crucial points argued before the
court.
According
to him, Akenhead accepted that the Nigerian Oil Pipelines Act provides a
comprehensive and complete regime for compensation for oil spills.
The
Managing Director of the Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Limited
(SPDC), Mr. Mutiu Sunmonu, has however, called on the affected community to
direct their UK lawyers to stop wasting more time pursuing enormously
exaggerated claims, saying the company wants to compensate fairly and quickly
those who have been genuinely affected and also clean up all the affected
areas.
Commenting
on the preliminary ruling, Sunmonu acknowledged that from the outset, Shell had
accepted responsibility for the two deeply regrettable operational spills in
Bodo.
“We want
to compensate fairly and quickly those who have been genuinely affected and to
clean up all areas where oil has been spilled from our facilities, including
the many parts of Bodo which have been severely impacted by oil theft, illegal
refining and sabotage activities.
"We
hope the community will now direct their UK legal representatives to stop
wasting even more time pursuing enormously exaggerated claims and consider
sensible and fair compensation offers,” he added.
Around
11,000 or 15,000 residents of the Bodo community represented by a UK law firm,
Leigh Day appealed in 2011 to a London court for more than 300 million pounds
in compensation for the spilling of 500,000 barrels of oil.
The
London High Court on Friday rejected the community’s attempts to expand the
scope of the compensation, ruling that the pipeline operator could not be held
responsible for damage caused by oil theft.
No comments:
Post a Comment