By Matthew
Philips and Asjylyn
Loder
Last
October, Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, the biggest U.S. pipeline operator,
announced plans to build a 740-mile pipeline from the oil fields of West Texas
to a refining hub outside Los Angeles. Dubbed the Freedom Pipeline, the
$2 billion project would deliver 277,000 barrels a day of cheap Texas
crude to West Coast refineries that had long relied on expensive oil shipped
from Alaska’s North Slope or even foreign markets. All Kinder Morgan needed was
to get regulatory approval and long-term contracts with large California
refiners, including Valero
Energy(VLO) and Tesoro (TSO).
In April, Kinder Morgan began
negotiating agreements with refiners, who normally commit to buy predetermined
amounts of oil for as long as 10 years. On May 31, however, Kinder
Morgan announced it was canceling the project after Valero and Tesoro said they
weren’t interested in buying the pipe’s oil on a long-term basis. They’d found
a better way to get their hands on domestic crude: railroads.
America’s energy boom has left the middle of the country awash
in cheap oil. But as pipeline companies scramble to spend billions of dollars
to build new pipes to tap these hot new fields, they’re discovering that
railroads have beaten them to the punch. By laying a few extra miles of track
and building new loading facilities, oil and gas operators are quickly
connecting remote areas of oil production with the existing networks of big
railroads such as Union
Pacific (UNP) and BNSF
Railway(BRK/A). On the
other end, they’re running tracks directly into refining complexes as far away
as Philadelphia and Puget Sound. These rail projects can often be finished in a
matter of months at a cost that’s usually in the millions, not billions.
The rail industry is now hauling more crude than at any time
since the days of John D. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil. According to the
Association of American Railroads, trains transported a record 97,135 carloads
of crude oil in the first quarter of 2013. That’s 166 percent more than
during the first quarter of 2012 and 922 percent more than trains hauled
during all of 2008. “This is a revolutionary change in crude oil logistics that
has rarely happened before,” says Julius Walker, an energy strategist at UBS Securities (UBS). “Very
quickly, railing crude has become much more competitive.”
While moving crude by pipeline
still costs about half to one-third what it does to move it by rail, trains
don’t require long-term contracts or need to wait for pipelines to be built.
And while pipes stretch only from point A to point B, refiners can access
nearly any market in the U.S. by rail.
That flexibility to target the
most lucrative markets has been particularly useful over the past few years as
regional prices have varied substantially. Oil sold on the Gulf Coast fetches
about $9 more per barrel than the same grade of crude sold in Cushing, Okla.
Three months ago it fetched $23 more. The ability to easily shift delivery
markets to maximize revenue is why “oil companies are leasing rail cars like
drunken sailors,” says Oppenheimer energy analyst Fadel Gheit.
Union Pacific, the nation’s largest railroad, tripled the amount
of crude it moved last year, helping boost its profits to a record
$3.9 billion for fiscal year 2012. BNSF, the No. 2 rail company,
which Warren Buffett bought in 2010, is now transporting about 650,000 barrels
of crude per day, vs. almost none five years ago.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) expects to haul 70,000 carloads of crude in
2013, up from 500 in 2009.
Much of this increase has come
from the Bakken shale formation in North Dakota, where crude production has
jumped about 250 percent since 2009. BNSF and Canadian Pacific have
invested heavily there over the past few years. Together they carry about
400,000 barrels out of the Bakken each day. According to a June report by
Bloomberg Industries, 71 percent of all Bakken crude now leaves the region
by train, compared with 25 percent in January 2012. Only
20 percent travels by pipeline, down from 61 percent in 2011.
The crude boom has helped railroads weather the hit they’ve
taken to their coal business. As utilities have switched to cleaner-burning
natural gas, coal shipments have fallen 23 percent since 2008. Hauling
crude can sometimes be more lucrative; according to David Vernon, a
transportation analyst at Sanford
C. Bernstein (AB), Union
Pacific generates about $2,500 per carload of crude vs. $2,200 for a carload of
coal because of the high demand for crude by rail.
Culled from Bloomberg.com
No comments:
Post a Comment