Barges of stolen crude oil |
Will this not reinforce failure in the fight against the
criminals?
President Goodluck Jonathan recently announced that the federal government has set aside $1 billion for the implementation of a comprehensive programme to curb oil theft and the vandalism of oil and gas infrastructure in the Niger Delta. “Oil theft is an aspect of global terrorism which has become a big industry on its own. It has become a major threat to the Nigerian economy and we need to work with all stakeholders to curb it,” said the president at an event where the vice-president of Shell Upstream International, Mr. Mark Droll, disclosed that the declining rate of crude oil production of Nigeria’s hydrocarbon resources may be as high as 15 to 20 per cent.
While we
have no problem with a new resolve to fight what has become a major
economic and security challenge for our country, salient
questions must still be asked on whether throwing a billion dollar at
it is the way to go. For instance, what was wrong with all the previous
efforts to contain the haemorrhage? What assurance is there that
this is not another case of throwing good money after bad? But
perhaps more specifically, of what use is the “Technical Committee
on Oil Theft” that has been established, according to the
Senior Special Assistant to the President on Public
Affairs, Dr. Doyin Okupe? Do you need a committee to fight what
isclearly an organised crime?
As most
accounts have indicated, oil theft impinges not only on our economy but
also has serious security implications. Indeed, to underscore the
gravity of the situation, the Senate recently lent its weight behind those
seeking capital punishment for oil thieves if only that would help to
redress the problem. According to Senate President David Mark, in the
course of discussing the Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB) that is yet to be
passed, “the law must have a huge punishment on those that steal our
oil to serve as a deterrent. The bill must also ensure that the current rate
of oil theft in the country is minimised to the barest minimum.
It seems we are having a bad name internationally because of the rate
of oil theft in the country. Oil theft deserves capital punishment”.
It is
difficult to fault the Senate President on the gravity of a situation in
which almost a quarter of Nigeria’s oil revenues is being
appropriated daily by some criminal gangs. Yet as we
have consistently argued on this page, it is also evident that the
problem persists because there is some form of official complicity while
the political will to address it is lacking. We recall that the
European Parliament once pledged its support for efforts to track
sellers of stolen crude by demanding the certificate of origin for their
products. According to Mitchell Rivasi, acting President of ACP-EU,
“we need to get traceability of oil to avoid theft. The oil companies
are involved in this and everybody is making big money. The bunkering
tankers are better equipped than the Nigerian Navy. This is a huge
international organised crime. We did it with diamond; we can also do it
with oil”.
Since no
serious efforts have been made to follow-up on such international
commitment, it would appear that the local authorities seem to have
given up on any serious attempts to rein in the criminal gangs. Yet there
can be no solution until Nigerians themselves resolve to fight
the menace.
Just
recently, the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative
(NEITI) disclosed that the nation has lost over 136 million barrels of crude oil
estimated at $10.9 billion through pilfering and sabotage between 2009 and
2011. Against the background that a huge chunk of the proceeds from
oil theft are used to buy arms, is establishing another billion
dollar technical committee the solution the authorities can come up with?
No comments:
Post a Comment