• NNPC: Trafigura, Vitol account for 9% of crude oil
lifting
• Corporation denies colluding with Swiss firms to defraud FG
• Corporation denies colluding with Swiss firms to defraud FG
Muhammad Bello
Nigeria may be losing an estimated $8 billion annually through the crude oil-for-refined products exchange arrangement, better known as crude oil swaps, which the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) has with oil traders such as Trafigura, Vitol, Aiteo Energy Resources, Mercuria, Glencore, Taleveras Group Nigeria Limited, Sahara Energy Limited, Etena Oil and Gas Limited, Ontario Oil and Gas and Rahmaniya Oil and Gas.
Nigeria may be losing an estimated $8 billion annually through the crude oil-for-refined products exchange arrangement, better known as crude oil swaps, which the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) has with oil traders such as Trafigura, Vitol, Aiteo Energy Resources, Mercuria, Glencore, Taleveras Group Nigeria Limited, Sahara Energy Limited, Etena Oil and Gas Limited, Ontario Oil and Gas and Rahmaniya Oil and Gas.
Of the
445,000 barrels of crude oil per day brought by NNPC to meet its domestic crude
refining capacity, slightly under 50 per cent is swapped with commodity traders
in exchange for petroleum products which are imported into the country. The
other 50 per cent is supposedly refined by NNPC’s refineries.
However,
the state-run oil company has said contrary to claims by a Swiss-based
non-governmental organisation (NGO), Berne Declaration, that 36 per cent of its
crude oil is lifted by Vitol and Trafigura, both Swiss traders, account for 9
per cent of lift contracts.
The
corporation also denied that the federal government lost $6.8 billion in oil
revenue as a result of the oil swaps it has with Swiss-based companies listed
in the NGO’s report, which prompted the probe instituted by the House of
Representatives.
Speaking
yesterday before an ad hoc committee set up by the House to investigate the allegations
made by the Swiss NGO, the Group Managing Director of NNPC, Andrew Yakubu, said
the oil corporation never sold crude oil to the firms at below market price as
claimed by Berne Declaration in its report.
“By our
records, Vitol and Trafigura account for 30.7 million barrels out of the total
of 341.07 million barrels sold by the corporation in 2013 lifting. The lifting
of Trafigura and Vitol in 2013 therefore represents 9 per cent of the total
lifting as against 36 per cent reported by the Berne Declaration,” Yakubu
explained to the committee chaired by Hon. Muraino Ajibola.
Instead
of foreigners dominating the oil deals, the NNPC boss said more chances were
given to Nigerian traders, who “collectively accounted for 98.2 million barrels
during the same period, other international traders including the Swiss trading
companies accounted for 61.2 million barrels, while offshore and the Nigerian
refineries took 36.2 and 38.3 million barrels respectively.”
According
to him, the selection of traders has standardised criteria, which evaluate
buyers’ facilities, volume of transactions, turnover and financial health of
the companies that is applicable to all, including Vitol and Trafigura.
He also
added that the 2012/2013 term contracts had a preponderance of Nigerian trading
companies with 23 out of the 40 regular buyers.
On the
issue of NNPC colluding with Swiss-based traders to sell crude oil at below
market price, Yakubu said: “Our pricing strategy is aligned to international
best practices in the industry. Our prices are based on a reference to the
benchmark crude Brent whose prices are published by Platts for the
international trading community, a premium/differential for individual crude
grades and the selection of an option.”
He
further added that the average of five consecutive days' publications by Platts
provides about 97 per cent of the value of any of its crude blends, while
differential/premium account for about three per cent of the total value.
“The
differential/premium are established based on a wide range of publications
(Platts, Argus, LOR, etc) and internal market assessment by the corporation for
all crude grades.
“These
processes apply to all buyers of Nigerian crude based on the terms prescribed
in the General Sales Agreement entered by all parties. Overall, our assessment
of the OSP (differential/premium) has matched or even exceeded the market value
of Nigerian crude grade published by Platts, Argus and LOR, as exemplified in
the following in the historical performance of the Bonny light since 2005,” he
added.
Yakubu,
who debunked the Berne Declaration report as “trying to portray NNPC in bad
light”, said its claim that 100 per cent of Nigerian crude oil is sold through
private traders was not true.
On the
sale of unutilised crude oil at knockdown prices to Swiss companies through the
crude oil-for-products exchange scheme (swap arrangement), Yakubu stated: “The
NNPC Act mandates the corporation to supply petroleum products to the
federation as supplier of last resort. In order to meet this obligation,
445,000 barrels of crude oil is assigned to the corporation at international
price for domestic refining.
“The
corporation disposes the unrefined portion of the assignment through direct
exports or other secondary arrangements including swaps to ensure procurement
and delivery of refined petroleum products,” he said.
However,
despite the insistence by NNPC that no losses had been made from its crude oil
swaps, it has come to the open that the federal government may have incurred
losses of a staggering $8 billion annually as a result of the deals with Vitol
and Trafigura, among other traders.
The ad
hoc committee probing the alleged scam noted that in most cases, the foreign
companies do not fulfill their own end of the bargain by refusing to supply
refined products.
Documents
given to journalists yesterday showed that NNPC allocated about 50 per cent of
its 445,000 barrels of crude oil per day meant for domestic refining to the
following companies – Vitol Limited, Trafigura, Mercuria, Glencore, Taleveras,
Sahara Energy, Etena Oil and Gas, Aiteo Energy, Ontario Oil and Gas and
Rahmaniya Oil and Gas.
In the
process, $8 billion in under-delivered products from the crude oil swap
arrangements has gone down the drain.
A report
submitted to the committee by the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency
Initiative (NEITI) also detailed how four of the oil traders “under-delivered”
500,075,239.3 litres of products in 2011.
They
are: Trafigura (173,786,600 litres); Vitol (654,440.7 litres); Taleveras
(152,308,878 litres); Aiteo Nigeria Limited (193,046,590 litres) and Ontario
Oil and Gas (180,278,732 litres).
According
to the report, Nigeria has lost revenue in billions of dollars, just as it also
alleged that some of the oil-trading companies owed the NNPC products worth
over $800 million.
The
report also showed that Duke Oil Company, a trading subsidiary company of NNPC,
was brought in as a middle player to protect some of the local companies used
in the swap deals.
However,
the NNPC during its presentation at the hearing, stated that the crude
oil-for-refined products exchange agreement with Duke Oil Company started in
February 1, 2011.
It said
the Pipelines and Product Marketing Company (PPMC) allocates 90,000 barrels of
crude oil to Duke Oil Company in exchange for the delivery of refined products
equivalent to the value of the crude oil.
According to NNPC, Duke Oil Company operates and manages the
swap arrangement by loading three cargoes through its nominated operators –
Messrs Aiteo Energy Resources, Ontario Oil and Gas and Taleveras Group. Each
company handles 30,000 barrels of crude oil per day.
The public hearing continues today.
The public hearing continues today.
No comments:
Post a Comment