Monday, October 13, 2014

The Keystone Killer the Enviros Didn't See Coming

When it comes to oil, U.S. is king. Discoveries in North Dakota and Texas have pushed American oil production past Saudi Arabia and Russia this year. The new supplies have boosted the economy and dialed down the price of oil everywhere -- gasoline at $3 a gallon anyone?
The price of oil has fallen so low it’s threatening the feasibility of controversial and expensive drilling projects proposed in the Canadian Oil Sands and the Arctic. West Texas Intermediate, the U.S. benchmark for crude, is going for less than $90 a barrel. That’s approaching the break-even point for profitability at many of the very wells driving the American oil boom.
“If prices go to $80 or lower, which I think is possible, then we are going to see a reduction in drilling activity,” Ralph Eads, vice chairman and global head of energy investment banking at Jefferies LLC, told Bloomberg News reporter Isaac Arnsdorf. “It will be uncharted territory.” [Read the story here.]
At the current price of about $87 a barrel, cheap American crude undercuts many of the most aggressive oil projects under consideration by the oil majors. About $1.1 trillion of capital expenditures have been earmarked through 2025 for projects that require a market price of more than $95 a barrel, according to a May study by the Carbon Tracker Initiative, a London-based think tank and environmental advocacy group.
Investors representing $3 trillion of assets under management have been pressuring oil companies to reduce spending on speculative projects and return profits to shareholders. For the past few years, “stranded assets” has been a buzzword among environmentalists seeking to sway investors about climate policy. The argument goes something like this: As countries ramp up taxes on carbon pollution, the added cost will make the most expensive oil projects unprofitable, so companies shouldn’t be throwing away money on new decades-long boondoggles.
Today’s cheap oil must be a conundrum for environmental strategists, who for years have argued against the Keystone XL pipeline and other expensive and heavily polluting oil projects. In this case, prices aren’t being driven lower by carbon taxes or reduced demand from energy-efficient technologies. Instead, oil is cheap because there’s just so much of it.

Unmoved by oil export proponents, Americans still fear gasoline spike

(Reuters) - A year of increasingly vocal support for easing a decades-old ban on U.S. crude exports has failed to convince American voters that doing so would be a good idea, according to a new Reuters-IPSOS poll that highlights the political perils of opening the door to shale oil sales abroad.
Americans remain split 50-50 over whether drillers should be allowed to sell their crude abroad, just as they were in the first edition of the survey last November. The poll is the only ongoing effort to gauge public sentiment on the issue, which has become one of the year's most pressing energy policy questions, particularly ahead of the November mid-term elections.
The survey reinforced a deep-seated fear that exporting crude would result in higher gasoline prices, a notion that many proponents, economists and op-ed writers have sought to debunk. Almost two-thirds of respondents said they would be opposed to crude exports if it caused pump prices to increase.
Proponents say that allowing the growing abundance of U.S. light, sweet shale oil into the global market would actually reduce worldwide crude prices, which would feed through to lower gasoline rates that are primarily tied to world prices. Some refiners have raised concerns about fuel prices, seeking to maintain restrictions that have buoyed their bottom lines.
The poll helps explain why many Republicans, who otherwise support free-trade ideals, have been reticent to take a position on oil exports, especially ahead of the Nov. 4 elections. Only a handful of politicians, most prominently Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski from Alaska, have openly rallied to over turn the ban, or at a minimum exploit existing loopholes.
"These latest polling results are a reminder of the significant hurdle that opponents of the oil export restriction still face in persuading the American people that free trade in oil will not lead to higher gasoline prices," says Jason Bordoff, a former Obama administration advisor and director of the Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University.
"Despite recent studies demonstrating that oil exports will not raise pump prices, and indeed may even lower them, there remains a disconnect between how this issue is discussed and perceived by those in the energy sector and by the general public," says Bordoff, who reviewed the results for Reuters.
CHEERING REFINERS
The results may cheer U.S. refiners such as PBF Energy Inc and Alon USA Energy Inc which have banded together this year to forestall efforts to ease the ban.
The lobby group Consumers and Refiners United for Domestic Energy (CRUDE), which includes PBF and Alon plus two other East Coast refiners, commissioned a poll in early August that showed 70 percent of New Hampshire voters would be less likely to vote for an elected official who had backed crude oil exports if gasoline prices rose. That poll included 418 respondents.
The IPSOS-Reuters poll, which surveyed over 5,000 Americans over two weeks in September, found that 68 percent of respondents believe the United States should keep its booming shale oil production at home to lower gasoline prices. Only 16 percent said it should export the oil in order to boost the economy.
In questions that were asked of only half the respondents, 39.6 percent said they believed U.S. producers should be allowed to export overseas, while 38.8 percent were opposed.
Despite Americans' misgiving, a flow of academic research and op-ed pieces hailing the benefits of exporting oil have emerged from a variety of places this year, including non-partisan think-tanks like the Brookings Institution, free trade proponents like the Wall Street Journal opinion page and even less typically oil-friendly outlets like the New York Times.
Even some staunch Democrats have lent their support. Larry Summers, President Barack Obama’s former economic adviser, says the merits of exports are as obvious as "any significant public policy issue that I have ever encountered." Former Vice President Al Gore said exports are "almost inevitable," and the topic is not a priority for his environmental activism.
One of the few questions to show even a small measure of change involved how much Americans know about U.S. oil production. In September, 6.5 percent said they knew "a great deal" and 24 percent said "a fair amount," up from 5.8 percent and 20.8 percent, respectively, in November last year.
(Reporting by Jonathan Leff; Editing by Marguerita Choy)

Sunday, October 12, 2014

Drilling Rig for 200,000bpd Egina Oilfield Sails to Nigeria

Ejiofor Alike

The drilling rig, christened ‘West Jupiter,’ which will be used for the drilling of all the oil wells at the 200,000 barrels per day Egina deepwater oilfield, being developed by Total Upstream Companies in Nigeria has sailed away from South Korea, thus demonstrating another milestone in the development of the $3.5 billion Egina project.

Speaking during the ground – breaking ceremony of the fabrication yard for local integration of the Egina Floating Production Storage Offshore (FPSO) vessel in Lagos at the weekend, the Managing Director of Total Upstream Companies in Nigeria, Mrs. Elisabeth Proust said the rig would arrive in Nigerian waters in November 2014 to start the drilling of the Egina wells in December 2014.

Proust said the Egina project had achieved almost 20 per cent performance of the expected works.
According to her, the ground-breaking ceremony is another milestone for the Egina project as it marked the first start of the in-country facility development, in which the modules built in Nigeria would be integrated onto the Egina FPSO in 2017.
“This is another milestone coming after many others already achieved in the past few months, such as the procurement of the drilling Tubulars, the gas export and Water Injection line pipelines; the first Well-Heads set; the steel cutting in-country for Living Quarters and subsea manifolds and finally, last week, the sail away of the drilling rig, West Jupiter to Nigeria,” she said.
Proust, who was represented at the occasion by the Deputy Managing Director of Total, in charge of Deepwater Manager, Mr. Charles Ngoka said Egina was a key project for Total in  Nigeria and a strong partnership with the Nigerian government, other international oil companies and local contractors.
Proust said her company had brought its expertise in this partnership and had also been able to increase local collaboration and Nigerian content in its operations through this initiative.
She said projects such as Egina empowered Total to further demonstrate its commitment to the Nigerian economy and her people.
“Total is fully committed to achieving the Nigerian Content Sustainability Target by ensuring teamwork between the international oil companies and local contractors. The main objective is to foster technology transfer, knowledge sharing and local skills development. As the first major project to be started under the Nigerian Content Act of 2010, Egina has overcome challenges with the LADOL initiative and created a landmark for the oil and gas industry in Nigeria,” she added.
Samsung and LADOL had established a new partnership called SHI-MCI Free Zone Enterprise to build Africa’s first FPSO integration and fabrication facility in LADOL free zone in Lagos.
Located 130 kilometres offshore in Oil Mining Lease (OML) 130 in deep offshore Nigeria, the Egina field development is a project to build FPSO for Total Upstream Nigeria Limited and the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC).
The FPSO would be one of the largest in the world, with a storage capacity of 2.3 million barrels of crude oil and a targeted production capacity of 200,000 barrels per day.

We're Sitting on 10 Billion Barrels of Oil! OK, Two

By Asjylyn Loder and Isaac Arnsdorf

Lee Tillman, chief executive officer of Marathon Oil Corp., told investors last month that the company was potentially sitting on the equivalent of 4.3 billion barrels in its U.S. shale acreage.
That number was 5.5 times higher than the proved reserves Marathon reported to federal regulators.
Such discrepancies are rife in the U.S. shale industry. Drillers use bigger forecasts to sell the hydraulic fracturing boom to investors and to persuade lawmakers to lift the 39-year-old ban on crude exports. Sixty-two of 73 U.S. shale drillers reported one estimate in mandatory filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission while citing higher potential figures to the public, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Pioneer Natural Resources (PXD) Co.’s estimate was 13 times higher. Goodrich Petroleum Corp.’s was 19 times. For Rice Energy Inc., it was almost 27-fold.
“They’re running a great risk of litigation when they don’t end up producing anything like that,” saidJohn Lee, a University of Houston petroleum engineering professor who helped write the SEC rules and has taught reserves evaluation to a generation of engineers. “If I were an ambulance-chasing lawyer, I’d get into this.”
Experienced investors know the difference between the two numbers, Scott Sheffield, chairman and CEO of Irving, Texas-based Pioneer, said in an interview.
“Shareholders understand,” Sheffield said. “We’re owned 95 percent by institutions. Now the American public is going into the mutual funds, so they’re trusting what those institutions are doing in their homework.”

Mutual Funds

Investors poured $16.3 billion in the first seven months of the year into mutual funds and exchange-traded funds focused on energy companies, including drillers that create fractures in rocks by injecting fluid into cracks to enable more oil and gas to flow out of the formation. That’s almost twice as much as in the same period last year, bringing total assets to $128.2 billion, according to New York-based Strategic Insight.
U.S. oil production surged to a 28-year high in 2014, bolstering the companies’ sales pitch and contributing to a 20 percent drop in American oil prices since the end of June. U.S. output is expected to grow 12 percent next year, to the highest level since 1970, according to the Energy Information Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy. At the same time, U.S. consumption will shrink 0.2 percent this year, the EIA said.

Annual Accounting

Marathon’s Tillman, who was speaking at the Barclays Plc CEO Energy-Power Conference in New York on Sept. 3, said there are “risk and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by” his comments. Many company presentations remind investors that publicly announced estimates are more speculative than the numbers the drillers file with the SEC.
Figures the company executives cite during presentations “are used in the capital allocation process, and are a standard tool the investment community understands and relies on in assessing a company’s performance and value,” said Lisa Singhania, a Marathon spokeswoman. The Houston-based company’s shares have risen 1.6 percent in the last year.
The SEC requires drillers to provide an annual accounting of how much oil and gas their properties will produce, a measurement called proved reserves, and company executives must certify that the reports are accurate.

Resource Potential

No such rules apply to appraisals that drillers pitch to the public, sometimes called resource potential. In public presentations, unregulated estimates included wells that would lose money, prospects that have never been drilled, acreage that won’t be tapped for decades and projects whose likelihood of success is less than 10 percent, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The result is a case for U.S. energy self-sufficiency that’s based more on hope than fact.
Judy Burns, a spokeswoman for the SEC, declined to comment on what drillers say during investor presentations.
A Rice Energy spokeswoman declined to comment on the difference between the numbers. A spokesman for Houston-based Goodrich Petroleum didn’t return calls and e-mails seeking a comment on the subject.
Predicting how much oil can be pumped out of shale has been controversial since the boom began about a decade ago. Companies combined horizontal drilling with fracking, or hydraulic fracturing. Fracking involves blasting water, sand and chemicals into deep underground layers of shale rock to free hydrocarbons.

Reasonable Certainty

Innovators such as Oklahoma City-based Chesapeake Energy Corp. (CHK) said that drilling vast expanses of oil-soaked rock formations is more predictable than the traditional, straight-down method of exploration. Regulators agreed and requirements were loosened starting in 2010.
A spokesman for Chesapeake Energy declined to comment on the rules for proved reserves.
To count as proved reserves to the SEC, companies must have “reasonable certainty” that the oil and gas will be extracted from existing wells and those scheduled to be drilled within five years. The forecasts are based on fuel prices, geology, engineering and the performance of nearby wells. Planned wells must be economically and technically viable.
For Harold Hamm, the billionaire founder, chairman and CEO of Oklahoma City-based Continental Resources Inc., the five-year rule is too constraining. It will take longer than that to extract a lot of his company’s petroleum, and he should be able to cite those resources in regulatory filings, he told the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee on Jan. 30.
“Those numbers are totally pessimistic,” Hamm said about proved reserves. Continental shares have risen 8.3 percent in the last year.

Lobbied SEC

Energy companies also lobbied the SEC to let them file more speculative estimates, known as probable reserves and possible reserves. Only three companies take that option, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The rest report only proved reserves to the SEC and save their other estimates for public presentations, which the SEC doesn’t supervise.
The data include year-end 2013 SEC filings, the latest available, compared with 2014 marketing materials, press releases, company websites and executives’ speeches for the 73 shale drillers. The presentations rarely explain how the drillers calculated the figures. The numbers sometimes change from one presentation to the next.

Total Estimate

Many of the companies use their own variation of resource potential, often with little explanation of what the number includes, how long it will take to drill or how much it will cost. The average estimate of resource potential was 6.6 times higher than the proved reserves reported to the SEC, the data compiled by Bloomberg News show.
Several companies, including Sanchez Energy Corp. (SN), don’t provide a total estimate. Instead, they publish variables such as the number of well locations and the estimated output from each one. Analysts often use these figures to independently compute the total.
Even though Sanchez Energy provides the variables for analysts to calculate its resource potential, the Houston-based company doesn’t publish a total estimate. Executives debated whether to include one and decided against it, said Gleeson Van Riet, senior vice president for capital markets andinvestor relations.

‘Garbage Out’

“We don’t think that a lot of the guesstimates that go behind those sorts of things will ultimately be constructive to investors,” Van Riet said. “Put another way, garbage in, garbage out.”
Denver-based Cimarex Energy Co. is one company that doesn’t report a different number to investors than it does to the SEC. “We want to have things on the books that are part of our near-term drilling plans,” Karen Acierno, a Cimarex spokeswoman, said in an interview. “A lot of people appreciate our conservative nature, a lot of investors.” Cimarex shares are up 19 percent in the past year.
The investor presentation by Canonsburg, Pennsylvania-based Rice Energy shows 2.7 billion barrels. Rice, which went public in January, reported 100 million barrels to the SEC in March, records show.
At Pioneer Natural Resources, the number they cite to potential investors has increased by 2 billion barrels a year in each of the last five years -- even as the proved reserves it files with the SEC have declined.
The rising number is “a game changer for this company,” said Sheffield, the CEO. “It’s a game changer for this country.”

‘Great Resource’

Pioneer’s numbers aren’t misleading; they’re conservative, Sheffield said. He said he’s shared them with Senators Mary Landrieu of Louisiana and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, the Democratic chair and Republican ranking member, respectively, of the Senate energy committee.
“Obviously it’s helped us in regard to making headway on convincing people to lift the export ban,” Sheffield said. “We want to convince them that we have this great resource. We don’t want it trapped here in the U.S. That’s for the public, the administration and Congress. So if we’ve got this great resource, why don’t you allow us to export it?”
The message is getting through. While Landrieu said she favors more study, Murkowski said she supports ending the ban.
A loosening of trade restrictions imposed after the 1973 Arab oil embargo would be worth billions to drillers such as Pioneer, Marathon and Continental because the price of oil on the international market in the past year has averaged 8.5 percent more than in the U.S.

Bakken Shale

“If you don’t allow the exports of this oil, they’re going to reinvest someplace else where they can market this oil,” Senator Heidi Heitkamp, a North Dakota Democrat, told CNBC Sept. 15. “And so it’s going to reduce the development and the dollars coming in.”
Joining her that morning was John Hess, the billionaire CEO of New York-based Hess Corp., who said, “We’re in a period of supply strength.”
Hess’s company told the SEC it had the equivalent of 659 million barrels of proved reserves in the U.S. The latest investor presentation said the company had 1.2 billion barrels just in the Bakken shale, in Heitkamp’s home state. Hess shares have increased 7.9 percent in the last year. A Hess spokesman didn’t return calls seeking comment.
Lee, the University of Houston professor, said in an interview that he’s alarmed by the inconsistent and overly optimistic estimates published by shale companies.

Shale Engineers

In August, Lee led a workshop in Houston on the best practices of reserves estimation. The audience in the ballroom of the Hotel Derek included engineers for shale drillers such as Marathon, Continental and Rice.
Pamela Allen, a senior reserves coordinator for Marathon, raised her hand and told Lee that she was worried that using outsized forecasts in public presentations would run afoul of the SEC and “come back to haunt us.”
Singhania, the Marathon spokeswoman, said she was unable to comment on Allen’s remarks without seeing a transcript.
“If a lot of people get burned -- and I think a lot of people can and will be burned -- by these numbers in the investor presentations, there may be a push by investors to get the SEC to do something about it,” Lee said during the workshop.

To contact the reporters on this story: Asjylyn Loder in New York at aloder@bloomberg.net; Isaac Arnsdorf in New York at iarnsdorf@bloomberg.net

We're Sitting on 10 Billion Barrels of Oil! OK, Two

By Asjylyn Loder and Isaac Arnsdorf

Lee Tillman, chief executive officer of Marathon Oil Corp., told investors last month that the company was potentially sitting on the equivalent of 4.3 billion barrels in its U.S. shale acreage.
That number was 5.5 times higher than the proved reserves Marathon reported to federal regulators.
Such discrepancies are rife in the U.S. shale industry. Drillers use bigger forecasts to sell the hydraulic fracturing boom to investors and to persuade lawmakers to lift the 39-year-old ban on crude exports. Sixty-two of 73 U.S. shale drillers reported one estimate in mandatory filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission while citing higher potential figures to the public, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Pioneer Natural Resources (PXD) Co.’s estimate was 13 times higher. Goodrich Petroleum Corp.’s was 19 times. For Rice Energy Inc., it was almost 27-fold.
“They’re running a great risk of litigation when they don’t end up producing anything like that,” saidJohn Lee, a University of Houston petroleum engineering professor who helped write the SEC rules and has taught reserves evaluation to a generation of engineers. “If I were an ambulance-chasing lawyer, I’d get into this.”
Experienced investors know the difference between the two numbers, Scott Sheffield, chairman and CEO of Irving, Texas-based Pioneer, said in an interview.
“Shareholders understand,” Sheffield said. “We’re owned 95 percent by institutions. Now the American public is going into the mutual funds, so they’re trusting what those institutions are doing in their homework.”

Mutual Funds

Investors poured $16.3 billion in the first seven months of the year into mutual funds and exchange-traded funds focused on energy companies, including drillers that create fractures in rocks by injecting fluid into cracks to enable more oil and gas to flow out of the formation. That’s almost twice as much as in the same period last year, bringing total assets to $128.2 billion, according to New York-based Strategic Insight.
U.S. oil production surged to a 28-year high in 2014, bolstering the companies’ sales pitch and contributing to a 20 percent drop in American oil prices since the end of June. U.S. output is expected to grow 12 percent next year, to the highest level since 1970, according to the Energy Information Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy. At the same time, U.S. consumption will shrink 0.2 percent this year, the EIA said.

Annual Accounting

Marathon’s Tillman, who was speaking at the Barclays Plc CEO Energy-Power Conference in New York on Sept. 3, said there are “risk and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by” his comments. Many company presentations remind investors that publicly announced estimates are more speculative than the numbers the drillers file with the SEC.
Figures the company executives cite during presentations “are used in the capital allocation process, and are a standard tool the investment community understands and relies on in assessing a company’s performance and value,” said Lisa Singhania, a Marathon spokeswoman. The Houston-based company’s shares have risen 1.6 percent in the last year.
The SEC requires drillers to provide an annual accounting of how much oil and gas their properties will produce, a measurement called proved reserves, and company executives must certify that the reports are accurate.

Resource Potential

No such rules apply to appraisals that drillers pitch to the public, sometimes called resource potential. In public presentations, unregulated estimates included wells that would lose money, prospects that have never been drilled, acreage that won’t be tapped for decades and projects whose likelihood of success is less than 10 percent, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The result is a case for U.S. energy self-sufficiency that’s based more on hope than fact.
Judy Burns, a spokeswoman for the SEC, declined to comment on what drillers say during investor presentations.
A Rice Energy spokeswoman declined to comment on the difference between the numbers. A spokesman for Houston-based Goodrich Petroleum didn’t return calls and e-mails seeking a comment on the subject.
Predicting how much oil can be pumped out of shale has been controversial since the boom began about a decade ago. Companies combined horizontal drilling with fracking, or hydraulic fracturing. Fracking involves blasting water, sand and chemicals into deep underground layers of shale rock to free hydrocarbons.

Reasonable Certainty

Innovators such as Oklahoma City-based Chesapeake Energy Corp. (CHK) said that drilling vast expanses of oil-soaked rock formations is more predictable than the traditional, straight-down method of exploration. Regulators agreed and requirements were loosened starting in 2010.
A spokesman for Chesapeake Energy declined to comment on the rules for proved reserves.
To count as proved reserves to the SEC, companies must have “reasonable certainty” that the oil and gas will be extracted from existing wells and those scheduled to be drilled within five years. The forecasts are based on fuel prices, geology, engineering and the performance of nearby wells. Planned wells must be economically and technically viable.
For Harold Hamm, the billionaire founder, chairman and CEO of Oklahoma City-based Continental Resources Inc., the five-year rule is too constraining. It will take longer than that to extract a lot of his company’s petroleum, and he should be able to cite those resources in regulatory filings, he told the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee on Jan. 30.
“Those numbers are totally pessimistic,” Hamm said about proved reserves. Continental shares have risen 8.3 percent in the last year.

Lobbied SEC

Energy companies also lobbied the SEC to let them file more speculative estimates, known as probable reserves and possible reserves. Only three companies take that option, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The rest report only proved reserves to the SEC and save their other estimates for public presentations, which the SEC doesn’t supervise.
The data include year-end 2013 SEC filings, the latest available, compared with 2014 marketing materials, press releases, company websites and executives’ speeches for the 73 shale drillers. The presentations rarely explain how the drillers calculated the figures. The numbers sometimes change from one presentation to the next.

Total Estimate

Many of the companies use their own variation of resource potential, often with little explanation of what the number includes, how long it will take to drill or how much it will cost. The average estimate of resource potential was 6.6 times higher than the proved reserves reported to the SEC, the data compiled by Bloomberg News show.
Several companies, including Sanchez Energy Corp. (SN), don’t provide a total estimate. Instead, they publish variables such as the number of well locations and the estimated output from each one. Analysts often use these figures to independently compute the total.
Even though Sanchez Energy provides the variables for analysts to calculate its resource potential, the Houston-based company doesn’t publish a total estimate. Executives debated whether to include one and decided against it, said Gleeson Van Riet, senior vice president for capital markets andinvestor relations.

‘Garbage Out’

“We don’t think that a lot of the guesstimates that go behind those sorts of things will ultimately be constructive to investors,” Van Riet said. “Put another way, garbage in, garbage out.”
Denver-based Cimarex Energy Co. is one company that doesn’t report a different number to investors than it does to the SEC. “We want to have things on the books that are part of our near-term drilling plans,” Karen Acierno, a Cimarex spokeswoman, said in an interview. “A lot of people appreciate our conservative nature, a lot of investors.” Cimarex shares are up 19 percent in the past year.
The investor presentation by Canonsburg, Pennsylvania-based Rice Energy shows 2.7 billion barrels. Rice, which went public in January, reported 100 million barrels to the SEC in March, records show.
At Pioneer Natural Resources, the number they cite to potential investors has increased by 2 billion barrels a year in each of the last five years -- even as the proved reserves it files with the SEC have declined.
The rising number is “a game changer for this company,” said Sheffield, the CEO. “It’s a game changer for this country.”

‘Great Resource’

Pioneer’s numbers aren’t misleading; they’re conservative, Sheffield said. He said he’s shared them with Senators Mary Landrieu of Louisiana and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, the Democratic chair and Republican ranking member, respectively, of the Senate energy committee.
“Obviously it’s helped us in regard to making headway on convincing people to lift the export ban,” Sheffield said. “We want to convince them that we have this great resource. We don’t want it trapped here in the U.S. That’s for the public, the administration and Congress. So if we’ve got this great resource, why don’t you allow us to export it?”
The message is getting through. While Landrieu said she favors more study, Murkowski said she supports ending the ban.
A loosening of trade restrictions imposed after the 1973 Arab oil embargo would be worth billions to drillers such as Pioneer, Marathon and Continental because the price of oil on the international market in the past year has averaged 8.5 percent more than in the U.S.

Bakken Shale

“If you don’t allow the exports of this oil, they’re going to reinvest someplace else where they can market this oil,” Senator Heidi Heitkamp, a North Dakota Democrat, told CNBC Sept. 15. “And so it’s going to reduce the development and the dollars coming in.”
Joining her that morning was John Hess, the billionaire CEO of New York-based Hess Corp., who said, “We’re in a period of supply strength.”
Hess’s company told the SEC it had the equivalent of 659 million barrels of proved reserves in the U.S. The latest investor presentation said the company had 1.2 billion barrels just in the Bakken shale, in Heitkamp’s home state. Hess shares have increased 7.9 percent in the last year. A Hess spokesman didn’t return calls seeking comment.
Lee, the University of Houston professor, said in an interview that he’s alarmed by the inconsistent and overly optimistic estimates published by shale companies.

Shale Engineers

In August, Lee led a workshop in Houston on the best practices of reserves estimation. The audience in the ballroom of the Hotel Derek included engineers for shale drillers such as Marathon, Continental and Rice.
Pamela Allen, a senior reserves coordinator for Marathon, raised her hand and told Lee that she was worried that using outsized forecasts in public presentations would run afoul of the SEC and “come back to haunt us.”
Singhania, the Marathon spokeswoman, said she was unable to comment on Allen’s remarks without seeing a transcript.
“If a lot of people get burned -- and I think a lot of people can and will be burned -- by these numbers in the investor presentations, there may be a push by investors to get the SEC to do something about it,” Lee said during the workshop.

To contact the reporters on this story: Asjylyn Loder in New York at aloder@bloomberg.net; Isaac Arnsdorf in New York at iarnsdorf@bloomberg.net