Showing posts with label US Crude Oil. Show all posts
Showing posts with label US Crude Oil. Show all posts

Monday, October 13, 2014

The Keystone Killer the Enviros Didn't See Coming

When it comes to oil, U.S. is king. Discoveries in North Dakota and Texas have pushed American oil production past Saudi Arabia and Russia this year. The new supplies have boosted the economy and dialed down the price of oil everywhere -- gasoline at $3 a gallon anyone?
The price of oil has fallen so low it’s threatening the feasibility of controversial and expensive drilling projects proposed in the Canadian Oil Sands and the Arctic. West Texas Intermediate, the U.S. benchmark for crude, is going for less than $90 a barrel. That’s approaching the break-even point for profitability at many of the very wells driving the American oil boom.
“If prices go to $80 or lower, which I think is possible, then we are going to see a reduction in drilling activity,” Ralph Eads, vice chairman and global head of energy investment banking at Jefferies LLC, told Bloomberg News reporter Isaac Arnsdorf. “It will be uncharted territory.” [Read the story here.]
At the current price of about $87 a barrel, cheap American crude undercuts many of the most aggressive oil projects under consideration by the oil majors. About $1.1 trillion of capital expenditures have been earmarked through 2025 for projects that require a market price of more than $95 a barrel, according to a May study by the Carbon Tracker Initiative, a London-based think tank and environmental advocacy group.
Investors representing $3 trillion of assets under management have been pressuring oil companies to reduce spending on speculative projects and return profits to shareholders. For the past few years, “stranded assets” has been a buzzword among environmentalists seeking to sway investors about climate policy. The argument goes something like this: As countries ramp up taxes on carbon pollution, the added cost will make the most expensive oil projects unprofitable, so companies shouldn’t be throwing away money on new decades-long boondoggles.
Today’s cheap oil must be a conundrum for environmental strategists, who for years have argued against the Keystone XL pipeline and other expensive and heavily polluting oil projects. In this case, prices aren’t being driven lower by carbon taxes or reduced demand from energy-efficient technologies. Instead, oil is cheap because there’s just so much of it.

Unmoved by oil export proponents, Americans still fear gasoline spike

(Reuters) - A year of increasingly vocal support for easing a decades-old ban on U.S. crude exports has failed to convince American voters that doing so would be a good idea, according to a new Reuters-IPSOS poll that highlights the political perils of opening the door to shale oil sales abroad.
Americans remain split 50-50 over whether drillers should be allowed to sell their crude abroad, just as they were in the first edition of the survey last November. The poll is the only ongoing effort to gauge public sentiment on the issue, which has become one of the year's most pressing energy policy questions, particularly ahead of the November mid-term elections.
The survey reinforced a deep-seated fear that exporting crude would result in higher gasoline prices, a notion that many proponents, economists and op-ed writers have sought to debunk. Almost two-thirds of respondents said they would be opposed to crude exports if it caused pump prices to increase.
Proponents say that allowing the growing abundance of U.S. light, sweet shale oil into the global market would actually reduce worldwide crude prices, which would feed through to lower gasoline rates that are primarily tied to world prices. Some refiners have raised concerns about fuel prices, seeking to maintain restrictions that have buoyed their bottom lines.
The poll helps explain why many Republicans, who otherwise support free-trade ideals, have been reticent to take a position on oil exports, especially ahead of the Nov. 4 elections. Only a handful of politicians, most prominently Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski from Alaska, have openly rallied to over turn the ban, or at a minimum exploit existing loopholes.
"These latest polling results are a reminder of the significant hurdle that opponents of the oil export restriction still face in persuading the American people that free trade in oil will not lead to higher gasoline prices," says Jason Bordoff, a former Obama administration advisor and director of the Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University.
"Despite recent studies demonstrating that oil exports will not raise pump prices, and indeed may even lower them, there remains a disconnect between how this issue is discussed and perceived by those in the energy sector and by the general public," says Bordoff, who reviewed the results for Reuters.
CHEERING REFINERS
The results may cheer U.S. refiners such as PBF Energy Inc and Alon USA Energy Inc which have banded together this year to forestall efforts to ease the ban.
The lobby group Consumers and Refiners United for Domestic Energy (CRUDE), which includes PBF and Alon plus two other East Coast refiners, commissioned a poll in early August that showed 70 percent of New Hampshire voters would be less likely to vote for an elected official who had backed crude oil exports if gasoline prices rose. That poll included 418 respondents.
The IPSOS-Reuters poll, which surveyed over 5,000 Americans over two weeks in September, found that 68 percent of respondents believe the United States should keep its booming shale oil production at home to lower gasoline prices. Only 16 percent said it should export the oil in order to boost the economy.
In questions that were asked of only half the respondents, 39.6 percent said they believed U.S. producers should be allowed to export overseas, while 38.8 percent were opposed.
Despite Americans' misgiving, a flow of academic research and op-ed pieces hailing the benefits of exporting oil have emerged from a variety of places this year, including non-partisan think-tanks like the Brookings Institution, free trade proponents like the Wall Street Journal opinion page and even less typically oil-friendly outlets like the New York Times.
Even some staunch Democrats have lent their support. Larry Summers, President Barack Obama’s former economic adviser, says the merits of exports are as obvious as "any significant public policy issue that I have ever encountered." Former Vice President Al Gore said exports are "almost inevitable," and the topic is not a priority for his environmental activism.
One of the few questions to show even a small measure of change involved how much Americans know about U.S. oil production. In September, 6.5 percent said they knew "a great deal" and 24 percent said "a fair amount," up from 5.8 percent and 20.8 percent, respectively, in November last year.
(Reporting by Jonathan Leff; Editing by Marguerita Choy)

Wednesday, May 28, 2014

The U.S., Crude Oil Refinery to the World

1. The U.S. has become the world’s fueling station, sending more gasoline, diesel, and other refined petroleum products abroad than ever before. Exports of these fuels have almost tripled in 10 years.  
2. In 2011, the U.S. became a net exporter of refined oil products for the first time since World War II.  

3. Exports are forecast to keep rising as European refiners close, domestic crude production rises, and demand swells in emerging markets.
An Old Formula May Overstate U.S. Oil Supplies
Jan Arps is the most influential oilman you’ve never heard of. In 1945, Arps, then a 33-year-old petroleum engineer for British-American Oil Producing Co., published a formula to predict how much crude a well will produce and when it will run dry. The Arps method has become one of the most widely used measures in the industry. Companies rely on it to gauge the profitability of drilling, secure loans, and report reserves to regulators. When Representative Ed Royce (R-Calif.) said at a March 26 hearing that the U.S. should start exporting its oil to undermine Russian influence, his forecast of “increasing U.S. energy production” could be traced back to Arps.
The problem is the Arps equation has been twisted to apply to shale technology, which didn’t exist when Arps died in 1976. John Lee, a University of Houston engineering professor and an authority on reserves, says billions of barrels of untapped shale oil are counted by companies relying on limited drilling history and tweaks to Arps’s formula that exaggerate future production. “Things could turn out more pessimistic than people project,” says Lee. “The long-term production of some of those oil-rich wells may be overstated.”
Lee’s criticisms have opened a rift in the industry about how to measure the stores of oil trapped within rock formations thousands of feet below the earth’s surface. In a newsletter published this year by Ryder Scott, which helps drillers calculate reserves, Lee called for an industry conference to address what he says are inconsistent approaches. The Arps method is particularly open to abuse, he says.
U.S. oil production has increased 40 percent since the end of 2011 as drillers target layers of oil-bearing rock such as the Bakken shale in North Dakota, the Eagle Ford in Texas, and the Mississippi Lime in Kansas and Oklahoma, according to the Energy Information Administration. The U.S. is on track to become the world’s largest oil producer by 2015, says the Paris-based International Energy Agency. A report from consultants Wood Mackenzie says that by 2020 the Bakken’s output will be 1.7 million barrels a day, up from 1.1 million now.
Rising reserve estimates give the U.S. a false sense of security, says Tad Patzek, chairman of the department of petroleum and geosystems engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. “We have deceived ourselves into thinking that since we have an infinite resource, we don’t need to worry,” he says. “We are stumbling like blind people into a future which is not as pretty as we think.”
The Arps formula is only as good as the data a company puts into it, Patzek says. Estimates can be inflated when Arps relies on limited drilling history for data or on a few high-performing wells to predict performance across a wide swath of acreage. Forecasts can also be skewed higher by assuming slower production declines than Arps observed.
In November 2012, SandRidge Energy (SDcut its reserve predictions to the equivalent of 422,000 barrels per well from 456,000 barrels. Five months later, the estimate was cut again, to 369,000 barrels, company records show. SandRidge has since made a small adjustment upward to 380,000 barrels. The early forecasts were based on a small number of high-performing wells, which led the company to overestimate performance for its other acreage, says Duane Grubert, SandRidge’s executive vice president for investor relations and strategy. The company now has more than 1,100 wells and has improved its drilling. It is confident that current estimates are reliable. “Nobody knew that until we actually ground-truthed the field by drilling it,” Grubert says. “What we came up with was, hmm, that initial estimate was a little high.”
SM Energy (SMof Denver suffered a similar setback this year when its wells in the Eagle Ford shale in Texas fell short of forecasts. The company on Feb. 18 cut its prediction in one area to the equivalent of 475,000 barrels per well from 602,000. Estimating future production from early data is a challenge, says Brent Collins, a company spokesman. “This is especially true when you are trying to estimate an average from a limited number of wells.” Both SandRidge and SM Energy use variations of the Arps method, company records show.
Tapping shale formations differs from the drilling in Arps’s day, says Dean Rietz, an executive vice president in charge of reservoir simulation at Ryder Scott. In 1945, oil production meant drilling straight down to hit pockets of oil and gas that had become trapped after migrating upward from deep layers of rock. Today’s drilling targets those deep layers, boring through thousands of feet of the earth’s crust, then turning sideways to chew for a mile or more through layers harder and less porous than a granite countertop. The rock is shattered by a jet of water, sand, and chemicals to create a network of small cracks to allow the oil and gas to escape. These fractured wells seem to follow a different decline trajectory than the wells Arps studied, says Lee.
Some in the industry defend Arps. “As far as Arps being old, the wheel was invented a long time ago, but it still comes in handy,” says Scott Wilson, senior vice president at Ryder Scott. Others are working to replace the Arps calculation. Researchers are testing new formulas with names worthy of an indie band: Stretched Exponential, which Lee helped develop; the Duong Method, devised by Anh Duong, principal reservoir engineer for ConocoPhillips (COP); and Simple Scaling Theory, which the University of Texas’s Patzek worked on. Rietz has made a computer model that simulates oil production. “Come back to me in 10 years, and I’ll tell you how reliable it was,” he says.
The bottom line: A 70-year-old formula may overestimate the future of U.S. oil production from shale.
Loder is a reporter for Bloomberg News in New York.

Tuesday, May 27, 2014

U.S. Oil Imports from Africa Are Down 90 Percent

An oil facility near Warri, Nigeria
The U.S. used to be the world’s biggest consumer of African oil, importing about a quarter of the continent’s total exports. Now it’s barely taking any at all. Since 2010 the U.S. has cut the amount of oil it imports from African countries by 90 percent, from an average of roughly 2 million barrels per day to about 170,000.
The shale oil boom has boosted U.S. production from 5 million barrels a day in 2008 to more than 8 million. The Energy Information Administration predicts that by 2019 that number will rise to 9.6 million barrels per day. For what it’s worth, Saudi Arabia pumps about 9.5 million barrels of oil per day.
Almost all of that new U.S. oil is light, sweet crude—the same kind American refiners used to import from West Africa. Now, instead of shipping it across the Atlantic, U.S. refiners are piping and railing it across the country. That’s pushed African oil to Asia (China now gets a third of its oil from Africa) and helped keep the world oil markets stable and well supplied amid large amounts of chaos and outages.
Energy Information AdministrationU.S. imports of African crude have fallen 90 percent
This is essentially the story of four major African oil producers that hardly sell to the U.S. anymore: Nigeria, Angola, Algeria, and Libya. Nigeria has seen its exports to the U.S. tumble the most, from more than a milion barrels a day in 2011 to about 38,000 as of February.
STORY: Junk Bonds Fuel the Shale Boom